Developing: Second Riyadh Airport Strike in Two Days, Death Toll Now 13
A projectile hit a passenger hall on Sunday while the Saudi capital's main airport remained closed. The Houthis claimed Saturday's deadly attack and operations against other Saudi targets, but responsibility for the latest strike has not been established.
Follows "We may. We're going to look at it," Trump says as 12 die at Riyadh airport.
A projectile struck Riyadh's main international airport on Sunday, causing a fire and injuries in a second attack in two days on the Saudi capital's international gateway. [1][3]
Saudi coalition spokesman Turki al-Maliki said the unidentified projectile hit Passenger Hall No. 4 at King Khalid International Airport on October 11. Saudi officials also reported intercepting a missile near the airport. The civil aviation authority said the attack caused injuries, while damage assessments continued. [1][3]
Yemen's Houthi movement claimed responsibility for Saturday's attack and said it had also targeted King Fahd Airport in Dammam and two facilities belonging to Saudi Aramco, Saudi Arabia's state oil company. Those additional operations have not been independently confirmed in the reporting available, which also does not establish who carried out Sunday's strike, how many people it injured or the extent of the damage. [1][2][3]
The airport remained closed on Sunday. Saudi authorities had reported 12 deaths in Saturday's attack, and India's embassy said an injured Indian citizen had since died, bringing the reported toll to 13. The repeated strikes put the ability to protect the capital's main airport under scrutiny even as Saudi officials reported a successful interception nearby. [1][2][3]
Ahmed Nagi, a Yemen analyst at the International Crisis Group, said the Houthi pressure campaign could harden Saudi resolve: "Rather than pushing Riyadh to step back, attacks on critical Saudi infrastructure could make the Saudis more determined to continue the campaign." [2]
A closed airport hit again
The Daily Inference reported earlier on Sunday that Saudi authorities recorded 309 injuries in Saturday's airport attack, which the Saudi-led coalition blamed on the Houthis.
The new strike followed that mass-casualty attack while the airport was still shut. Sunday's account contains two separate events: an interception near the airport and a projectile reaching a passenger hall, where it started a fire. Both were reported by Saudi officials. [1][2][3]
An interception is a defensive success. A fire inside a passenger hall is a security failure. Reporting both is essential to understanding the pressure on Saudi Arabia's defences: stopping one incoming threat does not make an airport safe when another projectile reaches the terminal.
Saturday's deaths also show the international reach of an attack on a civilian transport hub. Saudi authorities identified the original 12 victims as four Saudi citizens, two Bangladeshis and one person each from the United States, Jordan, Palestine, Syria, Sudan and Egypt. The later death reported by India's embassy added a ninth nationality to the toll. [1][2][3]
The consequences extend beyond the airport. Riyadh schools moved to remote learning from Sunday through Thursday, according to the USA Today report. A major international energy conference nevertheless went ahead in the city on Sunday. [2][3]
Those two decisions show a capital trying to keep some activity running while changing daily routines elsewhere. The conference could proceed, but the airport remained closed and classrooms shifted online. For Saudi authorities, protecting the city now includes deciding which parts of ordinary life can safely continue.
The Houthis claim other attacks
Houthi military spokesman Yahya Saree said on Sunday that the movement had carried out Saturday's attack on Riyadh airport. He also said the Houthis had targeted Dammam's airport and two Aramco facilities. [2][3]
The Houthis warned airlines, airport workers and travellers against using Saudi airports and airspace, saying those sites were vulnerable to attack. According to the BBC, the movement said Mecca and Medina would not be targets. [1][2][3]
That warning seeks to make the threat itself disruptive. Airlines and passengers must weigh safety before using an airport, and workers must reach the site for it to function. A threat aimed at all three groups puts pressure on the operation of civilian aviation, beyond the damage caused by any single strike.
The warning also makes the movement's choice explicit: civilian airports are part of its pressure campaign. Naming exceptions for Mecca and Medina offers no protection to the people using the airports it has threatened.
Saudi Arabia must now deal with both the physical damage in Riyadh and the threat of further attacks. The airport's continued closure is the immediate operational consequence. The broader security test is whether authorities can restore access while protecting passengers and staff. [2][3]
A renewed war reaches the capital
The attacks come amid a renewed escalation in the Yemen conflict. According to the Associated Press, relative calm following a 2022 ceasefire ended in July, when the Houthis resumed attacks and Saudi-led forces backed Yemeni government forces near the Bab al-Mandab Strait. [2]
That sequence places the airport strikes within an active military confrontation. The Houthi campaign is putting Saudi infrastructure under pressure while Saudi-led forces support the movement's opponents in Yemen. Nagi's assessment is that this pressure could produce a stronger Saudi commitment to the campaign rather than a retreat. [2]
The story so far 5 pieces since October 6, 2026, in order
Every edition in brief, three times a day, on our Telegram channel, on Bluesky and on Threads.




